Loading [MathJax]/extensions/TeX/boldsymbol.js
\newcommand{\uex}{{u_{\small\mbox{e}}}}
\newcommand{\Aex}{{A_{\small\mbox{e}}}}
\newcommand{\half}{\frac{1}{2}}
\newcommand{\Oof}[1]{\mathcal{O}(#1)}
Summary of observations
The characteristics of the displayed curves can be summarized as follows:
- The Backward Euler scheme always gives a monotone solution, lying above
the exact curve.
- The Crank-Nicolson scheme gives the most accurate results, but for
\Delta t=1.25 the solution oscillates.
- The Forward Euler scheme gives a growing, oscillating solution for
\Delta t=1.25 ; a decaying, oscillating solution for \Delta t=0.75 ;
a strange solution u^n=0 for n\geq 1 when \Delta t=0.5 ; and
a solution seemingly as accurate as the one by the Backward Euler
scheme for \Delta t = 0.1 , but the curve lies below the exact
solution.